Cheapest Places to Live in Montana

Montana, known for its stunning natural beauty, wide open spaces, and outdoor recreational opportunities, offers a high quality of life at a relatively low cost. Landmarks such as Glacier National Park, Yellowstone National Park, and the Little Bighorn Battlefield highlight the state's appeal. The state's economy is diverse, with significant contributions from sectors such as agriculture, tourism, and energy. Montana's tax structure includes moderate income and property taxes, which contribute to its overall affordability. Despite recent inflation and rising food costs, Montana remains one of the more affordable states in the western region, especially in its smaller towns and rural areas. The combination of a diverse economy and manageable living costs makes Montana an attractive place for those seeking affordability and quality of life.

Affordable living in Montana can often be found in smaller towns and suburban areas where housing costs and everyday expenses are lower. These regions provide a more manageable cost of living, which is essential for maintaining financial stability. Affordability is a crucial factor in livability, as it allows residents to enjoy a comfortable standard of living without undue financial strain. Factors contributing to the cheapest places to live in Montana include lower housing demand in less populated areas, supportive local economic policies, and efficient public services. Utilizing C2ER's cost of living data helps to identify these affordable regions, ensuring that potential residents can make informed decisions. In a state known for its natural beauty and outdoor activities, finding affordable living options enhances the overall living experience.

Lewistown Population: 6,107 15% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $200,055 Med. Rent: $1,097 Med. Household Inc.: $51,235
With a cost of living index that is 15% cheaper than the state average, Lewistown is the cheapest place to live in Montana. This area offers residents a remarkable blend of relatively low housing costs, budget-friendly grocery prices, affordable utilities, and economical health care services, making it an attractive destination for those seeking to stretch their dollars further. Whether you're a young professional, a growing family, or someone looking to enjoy a more relaxed pace of life, Lewistown provides an inviting and cost-effective environment to call home.
Glendive Population: 5,228 12% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $252,017 Med. Rent: $1,028 Med. Household Inc.: $69,887
The second most affordable city in Montana is Glendive and stands out for its cost-effective lifestyle. With an overall cost of living that is 12% cheaper than the Montana average, overall goods and services, housing, utilities, transportation and health care costs fall within a reasonable range. Median household income levels are steady and come in at , which helps to increase the purchasing power of the local residents.
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Population: 9,366 12% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $228,443 Med. Rent: $832 Med. Household Inc.: $63,841
Anaconda-Deer Lodge County lands in the #3 spot for the cheapest cities to live in Montana, with a cost of living that is 12% cheaper than the state average. With home prices averaging and rental rates coming in around , it helps that household income levels average about , which assists with paying the mortgage or your monthly rent. Its robust public school system and accessible health care further enhance its appeal, making it a great place to settle down. The strong community spirit and ample recreational opportunities add to its charm.
Havre Population: 9,938 9% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $301,285 Med. Rent: $1,114 Med. Household Inc.: $74,388
The cost of everyday grocery items, goods & services and of course housing, can have a significant impact on the overall cost of living in any area. Havre offers a picturesque and affordable living environment, with a cost of living that is 9% cheaper than the state average. Everyday items like ground beef , eggs , coffee and pizza are all fairly reasonable compared to most other cities, which helps reduce those grocery bills. Home prices are also fairly affordable (compared to the state average), coming in at around .
Great Falls Population: 60,209 7% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $335,395 Med. Rent: $1,113 Med. Household Inc.: $73,438
For those wanting to live well on a budget, Great Falls is ideal, with a cost of living that is 7% cheaper than the state average. Reasonable housing prices (compared to the Montana average) of and rental prices of are paired with economical goods and services and a range of free or low-cost recreational activities. The city's proactive economic development initiatives also ensure a steady stream of job opportunities, making it a smart choice for those prioritizing financial ease.
Laurel Population: 6,995 6% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $305,599 Med. Rent: $1,247 Med. Household Inc.: $83,463
Laurel comes in at #6 on our list of the cheapest cities in Montana and is a haven for those seeking affordability without sacrificing convenience. The city is known for its discount shopping centers and budget-friendly dining options and has a cost of living that is 6% cheaper than Montana. The city's local markets provide fresh produce and other groceries at reduced prices, while parks and community centers offer free entertainment and leisure. This city is perfect for enjoying a high quality of life at a low cost.
Miles City Population: 8,698 6% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $295,114 Med. Rent: $1,371 Med. Household Inc.: $80,101
With its cost-effective lifestyle, Miles City is an attractive destination for those looking to live affordably. The city boasts suitable housing costs, affordable healthcare, and a variety of budget-friendly dining options. The community is welcoming and vibrant, providing residents with a rich social life at a fraction of the cost. Median income levels come in at , which provides financial stability, purchasing power and increases the quality of life in the city.
Lockwood Population: 8,497 3% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $357,250 Med. Rent: $1,293 Med. Household Inc.: $91,531
A lower cost of living allows individuals to manage their expenses more effectively, reducing the risk of financial stress and debt. When essential costs such as housing, food, transportation, and healthcare are more affordable, people can achieve greater financial stability and resilience. Lockwood fits that mold and has a cost of living that is 3% cheaper than Montana.
Polson Population: 5,165 2% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $354,019 Med. Rent: $1,162 Med. Household Inc.: $59,293
Lower living costs can lead to a higher quality of life by making it easier for people to afford comfortable housing, nutritious food, and access to healthcare. It can also provide opportunities for better education, recreational activities, and community engagement, contributing to overall well-being. Polson is one of the most affordable cities in Montana, and has a cost of living that is 2% cheaper than the state average.
Helena Valley Southeast Population: 8,816 1% cheaper than Montana average
Med. Home Value: $397,364 Med. Rent: $1,446 Med. Household Inc.: $89,707
With a cost of living that is 1% cheaper than Montana, Helena Valley Southeast comes in at #10 on our list of the cheapest places to live in Montana. Financial stress is a significant factor affecting mental and physical health. By lowering the cost of living, individuals can experience reduced anxiety related to meeting monthly expenses, thereby improving overall health and well-being. The ability to afford basic necessities without constant worry contributes to a more balanced and fulfilling life.

Full list of the cheapest places in Montana

Rank Location Population COL Index Med. Home Value Med. Household Inc. 
1 Lewistown 6,107 87 $200,055 $51,235
2 Glendive 5,228 90 $252,017 $69,887
3 Anaconda-Deer Lodge County 9,366 91 $228,443 $63,841
4 Havre 9,938 94 $301,285 $74,388
5 Great Falls 60,209 96 $335,395 $73,438
6 Laurel 6,995 96 $305,599 $83,463
7 Miles City 8,698 96 $295,114 $80,101
8 Lockwood 8,497 100 $357,250 $91,531
9 Polson 5,165 101 $354,019 $59,293
10 Helena Valley Southeast 8,816 102 $397,364 $89,707
11 Sidney 6,559 102 $428,181 $88,139
12 Columbia Falls 5,854 104 $398,298 $71,202
13 Billings 113,244 104 $412,401 $89,189
14 Helena 33,820 106 $473,868 $89,267
15 Evergreen 8,660 106 $393,115 $88,728
16 Kalispell 24,848 107 $440,461 $71,294
17 Butte-Silver Bow 35,459 108 $287,308 $74,846
18 Helena Valley West Central 8,319 109 $467,751 $109,665
19 Missoula 77,349 114 $531,012 $76,536
20 Orchard Homes 5,688 116 $554,193 $106,295
21 Livingston 7,998 117 $412,257 $66,723
22 Belgrade 9,499 122 $462,344 $93,865
23 Whitefish 8,333 129 $749,149 $76,572
24 Bozeman 49,943 140 $729,130 $89,450

Methodology

To formulate the list of the cheapest places to live in Montana, AreaVibes utilized comprehensive data from the Council for Community and Economic Research (C2ER) cost of living index. The report is released annually and offers a detailed comparison of living expenses across various urban areas. The data is meticulously gathered by over 300 independent researchers, ensuring a high level of accuracy and reliability. The C2ER index encompasses more than 60 goods and services, categorized into six essential areas that significantly impact the cost of living. These categories and their respective weightings in the index are as follows: goods and services (33%), groceries (13%), health care (5%), housing (30%), transportation (9%), and utilities (10%).

Map of Cost of Living by State

  • Well Below nat. avg.
  • Below nat. avg.
  • Similar to nat. avg.
  • Above nat. avg.
  • Well above nat. avg.

The map above is a great way to help you discover the most affordable states across the U.S. By highlighting states with the lowest cost of living, this map provides an in-depth look at where you can get the most value for your money. By visually representing this data, the map allows users to easily compare different regions and make informed decisions about potential relocations or investments. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into the economic conditions and lifestyle factors that influence these cost of living statistics. Whether you're planning a move, considering a new job, or simply curious about the economic landscape, this map is a useful resource for understanding and navigating the financial implications of living in different states.