| Index | Camas | Washington | National |
| Cost of living | 140 | 119 | 100 |
| Groceries | 104 | 107 | 100 |
| Health care | 108 | 109 | 100 |
| Housing | 217 | 138 | 100 |
| Transportation | 108 | 112 | 100 |
| Utilities | 109 | 110 | 100 |
| Lifestyle & Entertainment | 106 | 112 | 100 |
| Household Items | 104 | 107 | 100 |
| Education & Childcare | 115 | 117 | 100 |
Are you thinking about relocating, but curious about the potential cost of living in Camas? Is it more expensive or more affordable than average? Based on the most recent report, the cost of living in Camas stands at 140, making it 40% higher than the national average. The cost of living directly affects the affordability of one's desired lifestyle. Knowing the cost of housing, transportation, groceries and other essentials in the new area allows people to gauge whether they can maintain their preferred standard of living.
If affordability is among your top priorities when searching for a new place to live, this area may not be the ideal fit, as the cost of living in Camas is among the most expensive in the United States. Just a minority of areas exhibit a cost of living at least 20% higher than the national average, and unfortunately, Camas falls into this category, which may not align with your goal of finding a budget-friendly living environment.
Housing costs are a major factor in the Camas cost of living index, and they often eat up a big chunk of your take-home pay. Unfortunately, in this area, housing expenses for both homeownership and rentals were 116.8% higher than what's typical in an average city. That includes the prices of homes and rents, as well as mortgage rates and insurance.
The real experts on a city are its residents. That's why we reached out to 5 locals to get their views on the cost of living in Camas. We surveyed the residents and asked them if they felt like prices were affordable or out of reach. The results were as follows. 0% found it budget-friendly with decreasing prices, while 100% said it's simply not affordable as prices have continued to rise.
Is Camas an affordable place to live? It's a good question and one that you might want to ask when considering any new city, as affordability can play a huge role in the decision making process. The cost of living index (which we covered above), as well as housing costs and income levels play a vital role in determining the affordability of an area. The median home price in Camas is 155.2% higher than the national average, while the average monthly rent prices are 27.1% higher than average. The affordability of any location can also be influenced by median income levels. Camas has a median household income of $172,490, which is 112.1% higher than the national average.
Groceries: Grocery expenditures have undergone notable escalation over the last 2-3 years. In some markets, the cost of food products has surged by more than 20%, while others have experienced only modest increments. These fluctuations in food costs can have a significant impact on the overall cost of living in any region. In Camas, the groceries index registers 4.2% higher than the national average.
Taxes: Areas with higher taxes, including sales taxes and income taxes, can contribute to a higher cost of living. Paying more tax for everyday household expenses like clothing and food will result in higher costs, as will paying a higher rate of income tax. The general sales tax rate in Camas starts at 6.5% and the income tax rates start at 0%.
Urbanization: Larger, urban areas boasting abundant amenities and robust employment prospects often exhibit a heightened cost of living, driven by the increased demand for services and residential relocation. Consequently, this leads to elevated home prices and higher rental rates. In contrast, sparsely populated rural locales or regions marked by diminished demand typically offer a more limited range of amenities and experience slower job market expansion. This translates into a more affordable cost of living.
The cost of living data for Camas shown above is based on a U.S. average baseline score of 100, making it easier to compare how far your dollar may go from one city to another. Housing uses U.S. Census home price and rental data, while all remaining values are AI-assisted estimates informed by regional pricing, climate, transportation dynamics, and local economic factors. These scores are best used for directional comparisons between cities.
| Cost of living index | |
| Groceries index | |
| Health care index | |
| Housing index | |
| Transportation index | |
| Utilities index | |
| Lifestyle index | |
| Household index | |
| Educare index |
| Median Income | Per Year | Per Month | Max Budget (28% DTI) | Max Budget (36% DTI) |
| Owners | $195,699 | $16,308 | $4,566 | $5,872 |
| Renters | $82,686 | $6,891 | $1,929 | $2,481 |
| State | General Sales Tax | With Max Surtax |
| Washington | 6.5% | 10.4% |
| State | Income Tax (Low) | Income Tax (High) |
| Washington | 0% | 0% |
| City | Population | Cost of Living Index | National Avg. |
| Johnson City, OR | 554 | 83 | 17.4% |
| Wood Village, OR | 4,182 | 109 | 8.6% |
| Walnut Grove, WA | 9,546 | 115 | 14.9% |
| Hazel Dell, WA | 22,532 | 125 | 24.7% |
| Battle Ground, WA | 21,669 | 125 | 25.2% |
| Camas, WA | 24,814 | 140 | 40.3% |
| City | Population | Cost of Living Index | National Avg. |
| Freeport, IL | 24,837 | 82 | 17.6% |
| Okemos, MI | 24,848 | 109 | 9.0% |
| Kalispell, MT | 24,848 | 107 | 6.9% |
| Somerset, NJ | 24,856 | 133 | 32.6% |
| San Fernando, CA | 24,761 | 150 | 50.5% |
| Camas, WA | 24,814 | 140 | 40.3% |
Here are the best places to live in Washington
These are the 10 cheapest cities in Washington
These are the largest cities in Washington
Check out the 10 safest cities in Washington